Notz Stucki Investment Conference

Notz Stucki Investment Conference – 14 January 2020

Louis-Vincent Gave during his presentation @NS Investment Conference, 14 January 2020

2019 was a great year for financial assets with every major market rising, some of them strongly, such as oil and the S&P 500. Against this backdrop there were some surprises which may have significant influence as we head into 2020. The meeting discussed four of these. First the breakdown of the China/HK relationship. Second the Fed reversing its tightening policy and restarting QE. Third, the unprecedented situation of $17tn of negative yielding bonds that was reached in August. Finally the divergence between the oil price and the performance of energy stocks; oil was the best performing asset of the year, but energy was the worst performing sector in the S&P.

Xi Xinping is the first Chinese President who has had a foreign policy of significance. Under his leadership China has adopted an imperial vision with its belts and roads policy which aims to tie China into the world and make it more central in global trade. To finance all the infrastructure surrounding this project required a deep, liquid financial centre which China was fortunate to inherit from the British with Hong Kong. However Hong Kong’s role was compromised by the elections in November when, with a big turnout, the population voted emphatically for the pro-democracy parties. Effectively 70% of the electorate voted against Beijing. As a result China will promote Shanghai and Shenzhen as alternatives, but for them to be credible China needs to take off capital controls, and this a risky process in a command economy. However it is because of this that official pronouncements from China have changed more from threats to devalue the RMB, to announcements talking of a strong currency supported by positive interest rates in line with Chinese people’s savings culture.

In the last quarter the Fed reversed its monetary tightening and restarted QE. They did this when the repo market broke down in September, and they started adding $60 billion a month to ensure it worked smoothly. Why did the repo market break down? It is not clear but it may have been caused partly by the fact that the borrowing needs of the US government are so enormous now that the private sector cannot absorb them, and so the Fed has to step in to maintain stability. From 2010 to 2016 US Government spending was flat (due to the constraints imposed by the Tea Party), but now it has exploded. The budget deficit now runs at $5.6bn a day, and the Fed funds between a third and half this. The Fed is scheduled to end this support in March, but in an election year the likelihood is that it will continue. In effect MMT has arrived, and it is noticeable that since the Fed reversed course the dollar has fallen.

The negative yields in bond markets represent the biggest bubble in financial history. It seems extraordinary that this happens at a time of monetary and fiscal profligacy. It rests on two pillars. The first is that interest rates will never go up again, and the second that investor demand for bonds will remain strong. The first pillar remains as strong as ever, but the second is wobbling a bit. Markets became more sceptical last year of assets with stretched valuations, as evidenced by the collapse of WeWork, and a sharp derating of companies like Uber. This scepticism could one day extend to the idea of paying to own an asset whose raison d’être was to pay you. Another development was that Sweden raised interest rates after judging that negative interest rates had not improved growth but had done significant damage to the financial sector and pensions. Sweden was an early adopter of negative rates, but their move will at least raise the level of debate in other Central Banks. More fundamentally, negative rates will start to battle with rising inflation figures. The US CPI is at a ten year high. More inflation may be in the pipeline – many of the riots and discontent seen around the world stem from the loss of purchasing power by workers. With labour markets tight, wages have the capacity to rise. In any event the ability of the negative interest rates’ bubble to expand further seems limited as governments turn more to fiscal measures. The new ECB Chairman said in her first speech that fiscal deficits should rise.

Q&A Session. Louis-Vincent Gave, Munib Islam, Stefan Blum

Finally what will come of the disconnect between the oil price and oil stocks? The oil price rise exceeded the S&P gain in 2019, but oil stocks were the worst performing sector in that index. This is even odder given that analysts predict that the energy sector’s earnings will be the strongest in 2020. There has been little new investment in the sector in recent years, and oil is a finite resource. There is a strong likelihood that it may break out upwards from the $40-60 trading range that it has been in the last few years.

Some of the assumptions that underlay 2019’s strong performance may be challenged in 2020. Inflation and the US dollar will need close watching. Inflation could rise further as a result of higher energy prices, or labour costs. Politics is an influence on both, and in the case of labour the increase in nationalism and consequent pressure to reduce flows of labour and immigration could lead to labour shortages. This takes place in the context of budget deterioration almost everywhere. For the investor it is time to look at currencies beyond the dollar – in the emerging market bloc, Australian dollar, Canadian dollar, sterling and gold. Negative yielding bonds should be sold, and only selective Emerging Market debt offers much interest in the fixed income space. In equity markets investors should start to look outside the US to the Japanese, European and Emerging Markets, and to sectors like energy and biotech.

From left to right: Louis-Vincent Gave, Stefan Blum, Munib Islam

Please here to access the speakers’ presentations.

Notz Stucki Investment Conference

Notz Stucki Investment Conference – January 8th 2019

2018 was an ugly year in financial markets with every major asset class falling. Equities were the worst performer, but even US Treasuries fell. Only US cash showed any return. Our meeting reviewed some of the causes of this poor result, and also the outlook for 2019.

The principle reason was that there were lots of demands on liquidity last year, that sucked cash out of financial assets. Interest rate rises were one of these pulls. Another was the Federal Reserve shrinking its balance sheet, a process that had reached a level of $50bn a month by the final quarter. On top of all this the US budget deficit is expanding steadily and is projected to reach 5% of GDP in a few years. The budget deficit is of particular concern as it is expanding despite robust growth and low unemployment. Expanding budget deficits are commonly associated with recessions when governments try to offset contracting growth. Worse the ageing of the US population mean that the deficit has a structural character as pension and medical demands mount up. Europe faced a similar demographic profile twenty years ago and solved it by cutting its military budget. The US is unlikely to do the same. Current projections for the US budget deficit are based on resilient future economic growth. Lurking in investors’ minds is the uneasy question of what would happen to the deficit if US growth slipped. It may be for this reason that the US dollar was not even stronger last year, when almost every factor was in its favour – vide hawkish Fed, US growth better than elsewhere, imploding EM and Italian dramas.

Notz Stucki Investment Conference January 2019 – Louis-Vincent Gave

After such a gloomy year it is natural for investors to worry about the most fragile parts of the system. The main candidates that are mentioned in this context are the likes of the Italian bond market, Deutsche Bank, and China. However a prime concern of Gavekal is the US corporate bond market. The last few years have seen a massive issuance of corporate debt. Much of this has been used for financial engineering not investment. Share buybacks by US companies represented the largest buyer of US equities last year – $750 billion in all of which $200bn was in the last quarter – and still the market went down. US corporate debt relative to GDP is at levels usually associated with recessions. Within the debt structure the lowest level of Investment Grade is BBB and there is a danger that some of this could be downgraded to junk status. A particularly interesting sector at the moment is energy. The sharp fall in oil in the last few months is positive for global growth, but not necessarily for US industrial production. The shale revolution has been a substantial part of US capex in the last decade, and much of that capex has been financed in the bond market. It is not a coincidence that the oil price plunge has been matched by a spike in the yield of high yield corporate bonds. In contrast to the old days a higher oil price is now helpful to US growth and many corporate bonds.

The other major change that was revealed in 2018 was in US China relations. For twenty years the international community has been striving to integrate China, and Chinese production has become intimately woven into the global supply chain. This process abruptly stopped last year, and is being replaced by something akin to a new Cold War. The difference to the old Cold War with the Soviet Union is that the Soviet Empire was economically separate from the West. By contrast China really matters both by virtue of its size and relationships. Apple is a good example of this. Perhaps no company has benefited more from being able to produce parts and assemble them in low cost China, and then sell the value added whole globally, with China itself being one of the largest markets.

The US China dispute is a major concern. What many in the West underestimate is China’s resolve to transform itself into a global trading superpower, building commercial routes that ensure the supply of hard and soft commodities, and access to export markets for them to send their finished goods. Xi Jinping is different from previous Chinese leaders in having what amounts to an Imperialist strategy. It is a direct challenge to the US hegemony. Another aspect of this challenge is China’s attempt to present the RMB as an alternative to the USD. China is trying to de-dollarise commodity markets. 12% of oil market futures are now priced in renminbi compared to nothing a year ago. If this trend continues there will be less need for countries to save in dollars, which they need to buy commodities, currently priced in US dollars. Control of the reserve currency has allowed the US to run its twin deficits. If this ends the US will have lost a huge advantage. As such China may have made a mistake by being so brazen in its confrontation with the US. This is the significance of the arrest of the CFO of Huawei in December, as in 2018 Huawei overtook Ericsson as the top telecom vendor in the world (and ZTE is the fourth largest now, another Chinese company that the US attacked). China seems to have miscalculated and overplayed its hand. One casualty will be the semiconductor industry. As a matter of national security China is pouring money into Chinese production to ensure they are no longer dependent on the US for these products. Consequently profits for the whole industry will evaporate because there will be no pricing discipline and significant new supply.

2018 marked a significant change because the forces of populism made politics much more uncertain, and the tensions between the US and China broke the surface. There was also further evidence that China’s tremendous growth rate is decelerating. Equities were hardly in a bubble before 2018 but valuations fell a lot last year throwing up some real value. For example, some UK equities and corporate bonds sold off dramatically even though the companies appear to be little effected by Brexit in any outcome of the negotiations. Some sectors that have worked well recently are facing more pressures, like technology and the FANGS, but the world does not look like it is heading into recession so for the patient stock picker there is abundant opportunity.

Through their presentations, our guest speakers offered a concise and readily applicable overview of the recent developments in financial markets.

Notz Stucki Investment Conference January 2019 – From left to right: Louis-Vincent Gave, Al Breach, Andrew Jackson

Please here to access the speakers’ presentations.