Chart of the Month – Small caps versus large caps: small is beautiful… Especially in Europe!

Small caps versus large caps: small is beautiful… Especially in Europe!

Source: Notz Stucki

It is often said that Small Caps outperform Large Caps over the long term; it is true, and makes sense. Smaller companies are more agile, tend to fall less under the burden of regulation, and are generally more “pure plays” on their businesses. On top of that, small caps are natural targets for larger groups, which frequently accept to pay a generous premium for acquiring knowledge, market share or capacity.

Despite that, as can be seen on the table above, Small Cap indices don’t systematically outperform Large Cap benchmarks on all time frames in all regions. We see that US Large Caps or Emerging Market Large Caps sometimes do better, but the differences between both is usually tiny. To wit, the SP 500 only lags the Russell 2000 by 50 basis points CAGR on a 10 year time frame.

But two regions clearly differ: Europe and Japan, where for all periods Large Caps lag Small Caps by a wide margin: the difference reaches almost 500 bps annually on a 10 year period (265 bps for Japan)! Such extremes call for a thorough explanation; when digging a little bit deeper into the indices, the underperformance of European (and to a lesser extent Japanese) Large Caps essentially derives from the index constituents. When it comes to Europe, Financial stocks make up more than 20% of the Large Caps benchmark, Telecoms and Utilities more than 6.5% combined and Information Technology only 5%, a very significant difference compared with Small Caps. Due to the dismal performance from Banks, Telecoms and Utilities during the last decade, we have the explanation. In Japan, the performance spread between Large Caps and Small Caps stems more from the heavy representation of car manufacturers (also poor performers these last years) in the main benchmark. And in the US the heavy weightings of Technology behemoths in the S&P explains the narrowness between Large and Small Caps’ performances.

Should we expect European Large Caps indices to catch up with Small Caps? We frankly doubt it as national champions in Banks and Utilities will remain highly represented and due to their utmost importance for Governments, there is a clear trend for these businesses to face tougher and tougher regulations, which does not bode well for future equity performances. They can be exciting short term trading ideas but can hardly be considered as attractive long term investments.

Consequently, we are still extremely favorable to the Small Caps space in Europe, especially that there are numerous talented boutique managers doing a brilliant job on the asset class, who generate high level alpha over the years. So by cherry picking them we get the best of both worlds: a very good asset class managed by very good investment professionals…. Beautiful, indeed!

 

 

Chart of the month: US Equities, small is beautiful (sometimes)

US EQUITIES: “SMALL IS BEAUTIFUL” (SOMETIMES)

Source: Bloomberg, IBES, Notz Stucki
Source: Bloomberg, IBES, Notz Stucki

 

In 1973, the British economist E. F. Schumacher published the book “Small is beautiful”. Although he did not talk about mid-small caps, the sentence is widely used to champion small players in all kinds of businesses. French & Fama published in the 80s the famous study that showed that, historically, small-mid caps had outperformed the SP500, which is called the “small firm effect”.

The lower panel shows the relative performance of the SP400 mid-caps versus the SP500 large-caps. During the last 6 years, mid-caps have outperformed large caps but not consistently, and so there are periods where large caps outperformed also. So what can we expect today and why?

The upper panel shows the relative PE 12month forward of mid-caps vs large-caps. The graph displays the ratio during the last 6 years with +/-1 and +/-2 standard deviations. Even though it is only a rough trading rule, we can see that when the relative valuation is one standard deviation cheap (blue arrows), historically mid-caps have outperformed large-caps (lower panel). From the valuation standpoint we are in a good situation to overweight the mid-caps in the US equity market.

From the fundamental point of view there are other good reasons to expect outperformance in the mid-cap universe also:

  1. Consensus earnings growth for SP400 mid-caps is 13.3% and 15.5% respectively for 2016 and 2017, whereas the consensus for the SP500 is 12.8% and 10.4% (IBES). Please, do not believe the absolute numbers, as analysts typically miss the growth by 6.5%, but the relative growth is what matters.
  2. The major victims of the strength of the USD are large caps which get a much higher proportion of their profits from overseas, so mid-caps will be more protected in this strong USD environment.

Both indexes have important differences in terms of sector composition as can be seen in the table below. This composition confirms that mid-caps are more exposed to the domestic market.

Total 100% 100%
Sector Exposure 30-nov.2015 SP 500 SP 400
Information Technology 21% 16%
Financials 17% 27%
Health Care 14% 9%
Consumer Discretionary 13% 13%
Industrials 10% 15%
Consumer Staples 10% 4%
Energy 7% 4%
Materials 3% 7%
Utilities 3% 5%
Telecom. Services 2% 0%

Source: Vanguard

Conclusion

In a low return environment, it is important to be able to profit from relative trading opportunities. With valuations relatively more attractive and better fundamentals, US mid-caps might be a better place than large caps.